Your cart
There are no more items in your cart
A secondary title could be : "After reading through Bach's Toccata end Fugue in F", as numerous aspects of the Non-Toccata & Fugue make reference to Bach's work : the structure, the meter, the key? But in reality, the omnipresent generating motive beginning in the very first measure is vindicated in its right to exist independently, despite these genetic resemblances to Bach's work.
Our post-modern era implicated the negation in the title, which calls forth a thought by Glenn Gould : "The determination of the value of a work of art according to the information available about it is a most delinquent form of aesthetic appraisal." In other words, how should we react in the presence of chronologically troubling works?
